LSSTApplications
17.0+11,17.0+34,17.0+56,17.0+57,17.0+59,17.0+7,17.0-1-g377950a+33,17.0.1-1-g114240f+2,17.0.1-1-g4d4fbc4+28,17.0.1-1-g55520dc+49,17.0.1-1-g5f4ed7e+52,17.0.1-1-g6dd7d69+17,17.0.1-1-g8de6c91+11,17.0.1-1-gb9095d2+7,17.0.1-1-ge9fec5e+5,17.0.1-1-gf4e0155+55,17.0.1-1-gfc65f5f+50,17.0.1-1-gfc6fb1f+20,17.0.1-10-g87f9f3f+1,17.0.1-11-ge9de802+16,17.0.1-16-ga14f7d5c+4,17.0.1-17-gc79d625+1,17.0.1-17-gdae4c4a+8,17.0.1-2-g26618f5+29,17.0.1-2-g54f2ebc+9,17.0.1-2-gf403422+1,17.0.1-20-g2ca2f74+6,17.0.1-23-gf3eadeb7+1,17.0.1-3-g7e86b59+39,17.0.1-3-gb5ca14a,17.0.1-3-gd08d533+40,17.0.1-30-g596af8797,17.0.1-4-g59d126d+4,17.0.1-4-gc69c472+5,17.0.1-6-g5afd9b9+4,17.0.1-7-g35889ee+1,17.0.1-7-gc7c8782+18,17.0.1-9-gc4bbfb2+3,w.2019.22
LSSTDataManagementBasePackage
|
You can use the C++ APIs to manipulate images and bits of images from python, e.g.
sets a 4x10
portion of image im
to 100 (I used im.Factory
to avoid repeating afwImage.ImageF
, rendering the code non-generic). I can't simply say sim
=
100
as that'd make sim
an integer rather than setting the pixel values to 100. I used an Image, but a Mask or a MaskedImage would work too (and I can create a sub-Exposure, although I can't assign to it).
This syntax gets boring fast.
We accordingly added some syntactic sugar at the swig level. I can write the preceeding example as:
i.e. create a subimage and assign to it. afw's image slices are always shallow (but you can clone
them as we shall see).
Note that the order is [x, y]
**. This is consistent with our C++ code (e.g. it's PointI(x, y)
), but different from numpy's matrix-like [row, column]
.
This opens up various possiblities; the following all work:
You might expect to be able to say print
im
[0,20] but you won't get what you expect (it's an image, not a pixel value); say print
float(im[0,20])
instead.
The one remaining thing that you can't do it make a deep copy (the left-hand-side has to pre-exist), but fortunately
works.
You will remember that the previous section used [x, y]
whereas numpy uses [row, column]
which is different; you have been warned.
You can achieve similar effects using numpy
. For example, after creating im
as above, I can use getArray
to return a view of the image (i.e. the numpy object shares memory with the C++ object), so:
will also set a sub-image's value (but a different sub-image from im[1:5, 2:8]
). You can do more complex operations using numpy
syntax, e.g.
which is very convenient, although there's a good chance that you'll be creating temporaries the size of im
.