LSSTApplications  18.0.0+106,18.0.0+50,19.0.0,19.0.0+1,19.0.0+10,19.0.0+11,19.0.0+13,19.0.0+17,19.0.0+2,19.0.0-1-g20d9b18+6,19.0.0-1-g425ff20,19.0.0-1-g5549ca4,19.0.0-1-g580fafe+6,19.0.0-1-g6fe20d0+1,19.0.0-1-g7011481+9,19.0.0-1-g8c57eb9+6,19.0.0-1-gb5175dc+11,19.0.0-1-gdc0e4a7+9,19.0.0-1-ge272bc4+6,19.0.0-1-ge3aa853,19.0.0-10-g448f008b,19.0.0-12-g6990b2c,19.0.0-2-g0d9f9cd+11,19.0.0-2-g3d9e4fb2+11,19.0.0-2-g5037de4,19.0.0-2-gb96a1c4+3,19.0.0-2-gd955cfd+15,19.0.0-3-g2d13df8,19.0.0-3-g6f3c7dc,19.0.0-4-g725f80e+11,19.0.0-4-ga671dab3b+1,19.0.0-4-gad373c5+3,19.0.0-5-ga2acb9c+2,19.0.0-5-gfe96e6c+2,w.2020.01
LSSTDataManagementBasePackage
How to manipulate images from python

How to manipulate images from python

You can use the C++ APIs to manipulate images and bits of images from python, e.g.

import lsst.afw.geom as afwGeom
im = afwImage.ImageF(10, 20)
bbox = afwGeom.BoxI(afwGeom.PointI(1, 2), afwGeom.ExtentI(4, 6))
sim = im.Factory(im, bbox)
sim.set(100)
del sim

sets a 4x10 portion of image im to 100 (I used im.Factory to avoid repeating afwImage.ImageF, rendering the code non-generic). I can't simply say sim = 100 as that'd make sim an integer rather than setting the pixel values to 100. I used an Image, but a Mask or a MaskedImage would work too (and I can create a sub-Exposure, although I can't assign to it).

This syntax gets boring fast.

We accordingly added some syntactic sugar at the swig level. I can write the preceeding example as:

im[1:5, 2:8] = 100

i.e. create a subimage and assign to it. afw's image slices are always shallow (but you can clone them as we shall see).

Note that the order is [x, y]**. This is consistent with our C++ code (e.g. it's PointI(x, y)), but different from numpy's matrix-like [row, column].

This opens up various possiblities; the following all work:

im[-1, :] = -5
im[..., 18] = -5 # the same as im[:, 18]
im[4, 10] = 10
im[-3:, -2:] = 100
im[-2, -2] = -10
sim = im[1:4, 6:10]
sim[:] = -1
im[0:4, 0:4] = im[2:6, 8:12]

You might expect to be able to say print im[0,20] but you won't get what you expect (it's an image, not a pixel value); say print float(im[0,20]) instead.

The one remaining thing that you can't do it make a deep copy (the left-hand-side has to pre-exist), but fortunately

im2 = im[0:3, 0:5].clone()

works.

numpy

You will remember that the previous section used [x, y] whereas numpy uses [row, column] which is different; you have been warned.

You can achieve similar effects using numpy. For example, after creating im as above, I can use getArray to return a view of the image (i.e. the numpy object shares memory with the C++ object), so:

import numpy as np
nim = im.getArray()
nim[1:5, 2:8] = 100

will also set a sub-image's value (but a different sub-image from im[1:5, 2:8]). You can do more complex operations using numpy syntax, e.g.

nim = im.getArray()
nim[:] = 100 + np.sin(nim) - 2*nim

which is very convenient, although there's a good chance that you'll be creating temporaries the size of im.