PhotometryMapping.cc

Go to the documentation of this file.

// -*- LSST-C++ -*-
/*
 * This file is part of jointcal.
 *
 * Developed for the LSST Data Management System.
 * This product includes software developed by the LSST Project
 * (https://www.lsst.org).
 * See the COPYRIGHT file at the top-level directory of this distribution
 * for details of code ownership.
 *
 * This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
 * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
 * the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
 * (at your option) any later version.
 *
 * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
 * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
 * GNU General Public License for more details.
 *
 * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
 * along with this program.  If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
 */
 
#include <cmath>
 
#include "lsst/log/Log.h"
 
#include "lsst/jointcal/MeasuredStar.h"
#include "lsst/jointcal/PhotometryMapping.h"
 
namespace {
LOG_LOGGER _log = LOG_GET("lsst.jointcal.PhotometryMapping");
}
 
namespace lsst {
namespace jointcal {
 
void ChipVisitPhotometryMapping::getMappingIndices(IndexVector &indices) const {
    if (indices.size() < getNpar()) indices.resize(getNpar());
    // If we're fitting the chip mapping, fill those indices.
    if (_nParChip > 0) {
        _chipMapping->getMappingIndices(indices);
    }
    // If we're fitting the visit mapping, fill those indices.
    if (_nParVisit > 0) {
        // TODO DM-12169: there is probably a better way to feed a subpart of a std::vector
        // (maybe a view or iterators?)
        IndexVector tempIndices(_visitMapping->getNpar());
        _visitMapping->getMappingIndices(tempIndices);
        // We have to insert the visit indices starting after the chip indices.
        for (std::size_t k = 0; k < _visitMapping->getNpar(); ++k) {
            indices.at(k + _nParChip) = tempIndices.at(k);
        }
    }
}
void ChipVisitPhotometryMapping::getMappingIndices(IndexVector &indices) const  {…}
 
void ChipVisitPhotometryMapping::setWhatToFit(bool const fittingChips, bool const fittingVisits) {
    if (fittingChips) {
        _nParChip = _chipMapping->getNpar();
    } else {
        _nParChip = 0;
    }
    if (fittingVisits) {
        _nParVisit = _visitMapping->getNpar();
    } else {
        _nParVisit = 0;
    }
}
void ChipVisitPhotometryMapping::setWhatToFit(bool const fittingChips, bool const fittingVisits) {…}
 
// ChipVisitFluxMapping methods
 
double ChipVisitFluxMapping::transformError(MeasuredStar const &measuredStar, double instFlux,
                                            double instFluxErr) const {
    // The transformed error is s_m = dM(f,x,y)/df + s_f.
    double tempFlux =
            _chipMapping->getTransformErrors()->transform(measuredStar.x, measuredStar.y, instFluxErr);
    return _visitMapping->getTransformErrors()->transform(measuredStar.getXFocal(), measuredStar.getYFocal(),
                                                          tempFlux);
}
double ChipVisitFluxMapping::transformError(MeasuredStar const &measuredStar, double instFlux, {…}
 
void ChipVisitFluxMapping::computeParameterDerivatives(MeasuredStar const &measuredStar, double instFlux,
                                                       Eigen::Ref<Eigen::VectorXd> derivatives) const {
    // TODO DM-12161: possible optimization is to merge transform and computeDerivatives,
    // and/or save these intermediate calculations when transforming flux to use in derivatives.
    // Like what AstrometryMappings do with `computeTransformAndDerivatives` vs. `transformPosAndErrors`.
 
    double chipScale = _chipMapping->getTransform()->transform(measuredStar.x, measuredStar.y, 1);
    double visitScale =
            _visitMapping->getTransform()->transform(measuredStar.getXFocal(), measuredStar.getYFocal(), 1);
 
    // NOTE: chipBlock is the product of the chip derivatives and the visit transforms, and vice versa.
    // NOTE: See DMTN-036 for the math behind this.
    if (getNParChip() > 0 && !_chipMapping->isFixed()) {
        // The chip derivatives start at 0, independent of the full-fit indices.
        Eigen::Ref<Eigen::VectorXd> chipBlock = derivatives.segment(0, getNParChip());
        _chipMapping->getTransform()->computeParameterDerivatives(measuredStar.x, measuredStar.y, instFlux,
                                                                  chipBlock);
        chipBlock *= visitScale;
    }
    if (getNParVisit() > 0) {
        // The visit derivatives start at the last chip derivative, independent of the full-fit indices.
        Eigen::Ref<Eigen::VectorXd> visitBlock = derivatives.segment(getNParChip(), getNParVisit());
        _visitMapping->getTransform()->computeParameterDerivatives(
                measuredStar.getXFocal(), measuredStar.getYFocal(), instFlux, visitBlock);
        visitBlock *= chipScale;
    }
}
void ChipVisitFluxMapping::computeParameterDerivatives(MeasuredStar const &measuredStar, double instFlux, {…}
 
// ChipVisitMagnitudeMapping methods
 
double ChipVisitMagnitudeMapping::transformError(MeasuredStar const &measuredStar, double instFlux,
                                                 double instFluxErr) const {
    // The transformed error is s_mout = 2.5/ln(10) * instFluxErr / instFlux
    // because the other components of the mapping (f0, the polynomials) disappear in the partial derivative.
    return 2.5 / std::log(10.0) * instFluxErr / instFlux;
}
double ChipVisitMagnitudeMapping::transformError(MeasuredStar const &measuredStar, double instFlux, {…}
 
void ChipVisitMagnitudeMapping::computeParameterDerivatives(MeasuredStar const &measuredStar, double instFlux,
                                                            Eigen::Ref<Eigen::VectorXd> derivatives) const {
    // TODO DM-12161: possible optimization is to merge transform and computeDerivatives,
    // and/or save these intermediate calculations when transforming flux to use in derivatives.
    // Like what AstrometryMappings do with `computeTransformAndDerivatives` vs. `transformPosAndErrors`.
 
    // NOTE: See DMTN-036 for the math behind this.
    if (getNParChip() > 0 && !_chipMapping->isFixed()) {
        // The chip derivatives start at 0, independent of the full-fit indices.
        Eigen::Ref<Eigen::VectorXd> chipBlock = derivatives.segment(0, getNParChip());
        _chipMapping->getTransform()->computeParameterDerivatives(measuredStar.x, measuredStar.y, instFlux,
                                                                  chipBlock);
    }
    if (getNParVisit() > 0) {
        // The visit derivatives start at the last chip derivative, independent of the full-fit indices.
        Eigen::Ref<Eigen::VectorXd> visitBlock = derivatives.segment(getNParChip(), getNParVisit());
        _visitMapping->getTransform()->computeParameterDerivatives(
                measuredStar.getXFocal(), measuredStar.getYFocal(), instFlux, visitBlock);
    }
}
void ChipVisitMagnitudeMapping::computeParameterDerivatives(MeasuredStar const &measuredStar, double instFlux, {…}
 
}  // namespace jointcal
}  // namespace lsst