|
LSSTApplications
10.0+286,10.0+36,10.0+46,10.0-2-g4f67435,10.1+152,10.1+37,11.0,11.0+1,11.0-1-g47edd16,11.0-1-g60db491,11.0-1-g7418c06,11.0-2-g04d2804,11.0-2-g68503cd,11.0-2-g818369d,11.0-2-gb8b8ce7
LSSTDataManagementBasePackage
|
All of these algorithms require the inclusion of lsst/afw/image/ImageAlgorithm.h, and are in namespace lsst::afw::image.
afw supports for_each_pixel as a way to process each pixel in an Image, in a similar way to the STL's for_each. The name doesn't follow the LSST C++ guidelines, but in this case I felt that conformity to the spirit of the STL was more important. There are variants of for_each_pixel corresponding to setting a pixel to a function, setting it to a function of an Image, and setting it to a function of its value and a second Image's pixel value. The selection of which of these operations is desired is done by requiring the functor to inherit from a class such as pixelOp0 or pixelOp1XY, each of which is a tr1::function with a virtual operator() added.
for_each_pixel(Image<LhsT> &lhs, pixelOp0<LhsT> const& func) Set each pixel in lhs to the value of func.
for_each_pixel(Image<LhsT> &lhs, pixelOp1<LhsT> const& func) Set each pixel in lhs to the value of func(lhs).
for_each_pixel(Image<LhsT> &lhs, pixelOp1XY<LhsT> const& func) Set each pixel in lhs to the value of func(x, y, lhs).
for_each_pixel(Image<LhsT> &lhs, Image<RhsT> const& rhs, pixelOp1<RhsT> const& func) Set each pixel in lhs to the value of func(lhs).
for_each_pixel(Image<LhsT> &lhs, Image<RhsT> const& rhs, pixelOp2<Lhs, RhsT> const& func) Set each pixel in lhs to the value of func(lhs, rhs).
for_each_pixel(Image<LhsT> &lhs, Image<RhsT> const& rhs, pixelOp2XY<Lhs, RhsT> const& func) Set each pixel in lhs to the value of func(x, y, lhs, rhs).
This code is in forEachPixel.cc.
Include needed header file, and define a namespace alias
operator() is declared const, as we pass these functors by (const) reference. If this surprises you, take a look at Meyers, Effective STL, Item 38.
std::fill, but if I called it fill then following a using namespace std; the compiler would complain about ambiguity; it's simpler just to use a different name.
Here are examples of pixelOp1 and pixelOp2.
erase to each pixel in img1, setVal to each pixel in img2, set img1 = img2 + 1, and finally img1 /= img1
(xc, yc) and with central intensity 1000.
1.8.5